When you are facing drug charges, working closely with an attorney who will explain clearly all your rights, options and potential consequences can help to ensure that you make decision that are in your best interests. Contact our firm today to schedule a consultation and case evaluation with an experienced criminal defense attorney.
If you are facing drug charges in Maricopa County, Yavapai County, Coconino County, Yuma County, Mohave County or Pima County, Arizona, it is critical that you retain an experienced lawyer who can aggressively represent you and protect your rights. Michael E. Ziton is an experienced Arizona drug lawyer you can trust whether you are charged in state or federal court. Call the Law Offices of Michael E. Ziton at 602-234-9290 for help today.
Thank you for contacting the Law Offices of Michael E. Ziton. Your message has been sent. We will promptly reply to your inquiry.
Call us now
or use the form below.
If you are arrested for a drug crime, you should know you still have rights. The Fourth Amendment still protects you against unlawful search and seizure. At the Law Offices of Michael E. Ziton, we fight to exclude evidence obtained by unlawful search and seizure.
If you are arrested and charged with a drug crime like marijuana possession, felony drug possession or the distribution, importation or transportation of illegal drugs, the representation of an experienced criminal defense attorney can be the difference between a conviction and an acquittal. Contact the Law Offices of Michael E. Ziton & Associates at 602-234-9290 for help today.
Searches and Seizures in Drug Cases
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Particularly in drug cases, the legality of how law enforcement officials obtained the evidence used to support the State's case is a central and often-challenged issue. If the government's conduct violated the Fourth Amendment, the evidence is deemed inadmissible. Without the necessary evidence to prove the criminal charges, the State may have to dismiss its case against a defendant. If you have been charged with a drug crime, contact The Law Offices of Michael E. Ziton, P.C. & Associates in Phoenix, Arizona, today to schedule a consultation with a criminal defense attorney who can advise you whether the evidence leading the charge may have resulted from an illegal search or seizure.
The Fourth Amendment provides:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
In addition, similar provisions in each state's constitution may afford even greater protections.
Warrants and the Protection of Privacy
Fourth Amendment protections apply to situations where persons have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as their home or personal communications, for instance. However, whether the expectation is "reasonable" is the key to whether it is protected by the Constitution. Reasonableness is context-specific. The court looks at an individual's intention to keep something private and whether the expectation is one that society is willing to recognize as reasonable. Just as standards of privacy are constantly changing in society, Fourth Amendment law is also constantly evolving.
The government can intrude on such a zone of privacy only if the search or seizure is reasonable. Generally, a "reasonable" search or seizure is one supported by a warrant. The warrant itself has to be valid. A warrant is valid if issued by a neutral judicial official, supported by probable cause and specifically identifies the person or thing to be searched or seized. To establish "probable cause," the law enforcement officer has to present facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime is being, or has been, committed.
Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement
The Supreme Court has recognized a number of exceptions to the warrant requirement. A warrantless search or seizure is still "reasonable" if there is probable cause and certain circumstances exist that make getting a warrant impractical or impossible. These exceptions include:
- Search incident to arrest: searching a person after a lawful arrest to locate weapons and/or prevent the destruction of evidence
- Consent: when an individual voluntarily waives his or her Fourth Amendment rights
- Plain view: searching or seizing objects in plain view, if an officer has a legal right to be in that position where he or she is viewing the objects
- Automobile exception: searching vehicles if an officer has probable cause to believe there is contraband inside and it would be moved before a warrant can be obtained
- Exigent circumstances: when there is no opportunity to obtain a warrant due to an emergency situation, e.g., life is at risk
Besides these exceptions, law enforcement officers can conduct limited detentions and frisks without a warrant if they have an articulable suspicion that criminal activity is occurring.
Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney
Analyzing whether a search or seizure was legal requires a close look at many factors. In a drug case, a successful challenge to evidence can mean the difference between a dismissal and a conviction. Contact The Law Offices of Michael E. Ziton, P.C. & Associates in Phoenix, Arizona, today to schedule a consultation with a criminal defense lawyer to discuss your situation and learn about your rights and options.
Copyright © 2012 FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business
DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent legal counsel for advice on any legal matter.
